We will be hosting our first poetry slam of the year at 7pm in the
IMUG. Starbucks has helped us out with a cash prize. This slam is open
to anyone feeling the need to bless the Bloomington hip hop masses with
their creativity. Please come early to register (6:30ish).
Bikari Kitwana Lecture @ IU Auditorium. 7p.
Hip Hop Congress teams up with Union Board for this Black History Month
Speech from famed author and former Editor of the Source. Kitwana has
written several books about race and hip hop, was involved with the
“Bible of Hip Hop” during it’s Golden years, and is currently involved
in his own lecture series.
Scratch screening @ Whittenberger Auditorium, Indiana Memorial Union. 7p.
We are going to be screening the most famous DJ-focused hip hop
documentary and also holding a Q+A/meet-and-greet with one of the
executive directors of the film, John Carluccio. Carluccio is also most
famous for inventing TTM, a way of representing DJ produced scratches
on sheet music. Also, there will be some Congress DJs in full effect to
answer any questions or give demonstrations before and after the event.
NOISE @ The Indiana Memorial Union Gallery feat. White Rhino and Crew, Feso, DJ Ali One, and DJ Krotch. 7p. free.
(Relatively) recent show video
I’ve been slacking on uploading video I’ve taken of recent shows.
John Anderson playing a show with Disaster on 2007.01.07
Hannah , Darren, and Nick’s new band playing a show at House Gone Wylie some time in January. I thought they were terrific. I’m really excited about all the new bands starting in Bloomington, and they’re one of my favorites.
The Grade Grubbers, from Buffalo, also played that show.
Bitter Homes and Gardens is another new Bloomington band. We played with them at Punk Night at Uncle Festers.

We played with Delay, Taigaa! and Ghost Mice in Columbus recently.
Here is a song fron Taigaa!’s set.
Prisons Often Shackle Pregnant Inmates in Labor
I originally posted this over at the midwest pages to prisoners blog.

I came across this article today that describes the surprisingly prevalent practice of shackling incarcerated women while they are in labor. Apparently, only Illinois and California have laws expressly prohibiting this practice. Other states have formal policies banning the practice, and some others claim to have informal policies. The article states that “Many states justify restraints because the prisoners remain escape risks, though there have apparently been no instances of escape attempts by women in labor.”
The article also provides some statistics about the number of pregnant women who are incarcerated:
About 5 percent of female prisoners arrive pregnant, according to a 1999 report by the Justice Department. The Sentencing Project, a research and advocacy group, estimates that 40,000 women are admitted to the nation’s prisons each year, suggesting that 2,000 babies are born to American prisoners annually.
Finally, a quote by one nurse gives a distressing picture of incarcerated childbirth:
“Here this young woman was in active labor,” Ms. Simpson wrote, “handcuffed to the armed guard, wearing shackles, in her orange outfit that was dripping wet with amniotic fluid. Her age: 15!”
Update:
I asked my friend Tess, who is studying social work at Indiana University and is doing her practicum at the Indiana Womens Prison (IWP) up in Indianapolis about incarcerated mothers in Indiana, and this is what she had to say:
i am not too in-tune with a lot of specifics at IWP, but i have done a lot of research on the subject. every pregnant woman that is sentenced to prison in indiana stays at IWP. we have a great family preservation program, including an RN, casemanager and a social worker. the RN, Ms. Jura Finn, has a pre-natal group that meets once or twice a week. in that group, they eat healthy food and talk about parenting issues. the family preservation staff also help the women set up placement for the child until she is released from prison. when they go into labor, pregnant offenders give birth at wishard hospital in indianapolis, without shackles or handcuffs. guards are in the hospital, as well. the father or the child or the offender’s mother is allowed to be present in the room, too. i am unsure how long they get to stay with the baby…
overall, i was under the impression that amnesty international’s expose in the late 90s about women being forced to give birth in shackles had kinda ended the practice. it’s unfortunate that it still happens. also, if arkansas only has about 50 incarcerated women giving birth a year, it doesn’t surprise me; they don’t have enough experience with pregnant women. i was glad to read that certain nurses are putting their feet down with guards. it would never happen in indiana, b/c indiana does not think that women can committ offenses that warrant maximum security precautions (under revamped legislation from mitch daniels). i am really interested in prison nurseries and residential programs for incarcerated women and their infants. there are only three prison nurseries in existence right now: 2 in new york (one being the bedford hills correctional facility which has been around since 1901!) and another in nebraska. short-term studies have found that these programs really are effective in reducing recidivism, but not enough research has been done. a lot of programs that exist to keep the new mother and new child together put a lot of emphasis on breaking cycles of incarceration and forming healthy bonds of attachment. programs called MINT (mothers and infants nursing together) in california, MILK (mothers inside loving kids) in virginia, WIAR (women and infants at risk) in michigan. if yr mother gave birth to you in prison, you have a greater chance of doing time later in life (that’s true of any child with an incarecerated parent). also, the bonds of attachment that form right after a child is born are so important to typical development. if you do not have a care-giver to attach to, it could cause emotional and behavior challenges throughout yr entire life. wow.
“I don’t want my 17-year-old son to have to pick tomatoes or make beds in Las Vegas.”
I stumbled across this quote on the Internet. It’s from Karl Rove, allegedly uttered at a Republican Women’s convention when talking about the benefits of Bush’s immigration policy. I came across the quote in the context of an editorial on the conservative National Review website.
The editorial’s commentary is pretty interesting:
It is precisely Rove’s son (and my own, and those of the rest of us in the educated elite) who should work picking tomatoes or making beds, or washing restaurant dishes, or mowing lawns, especially when they’re young, to help them develop some of the personal and civic virtues needed for self-government. It’s not that I want my kids to make careers of picking tomatoes; Mexican farmworkers don’t want that either. But we must inculcate in our children, especially those likely to go on to high-paying occupations, that there is no such thing as work that is beneath them.
…
This is why the president’s “willing worker/willing employer” immigration extravaganza is morally wrong — it’s not just that it will cost taxpayers untold billions, or that it will beggar our own blue-collar workers, or that it will compromise security, or that it will further dissolve our sovereignty. It would do all that, of course, but most importantly it would change the very nature of our society for the worse, creating whole occupations deemed to be unfit for respectable Americans, for which little brown people have to be imported from abroad. In other words, mass immigration, even now, is moving us toward an unequal, master-servant society.
The use of the phrase “educated elite” gives me the fear, and the editorial’s ultimate conclusion seems to call for a more closed-bordered approach to immigration. Also, the idea that we don’t already have a master-servant society and attributing this toward mass immigration (um, slavery, colonialism anybody?) seems to make this argument rather rethorical. Still, it shows that immigration is a complicated issue, even within Republican ranks. Rove’s comment is disgusting and describes, for me; the desire to preserve resources and privilege for those who have it, at all costs, that I find so frightening. However, I’m also really uncomfortable with the editorial’s idea that you could equate labor that a young, wealthy person could do voluntarily and temporarily, with the labor reality of many undocumented workers. I’m not denying that in the history of many families with wealth, there is a working class history, and individuals who made some significant sacrifices for their families. However, the rags to riches mythology that many conservatives (and punk kids for that matter) use to justify the preservation of resources and privilege is an incomplete narrative. There are a lot of reasons why some people have been able to accumulate and preserve wealth while others have not, beyond just personal industriousness. If we’re going to value hard work as a culture, we owe it to ourselves to do that in the open context of those other, often unfair and ugly, factors.
Family Prison Cells
I posted this at the Midwest Pages to Prisoners Blog.
This is an interesting follow up to my post earlier this week about mothers in prison. This image is from a Spanish prison that has cell units for families, allegedly the only such facilities in the world.

On a related note, the Women of Color Blog has some recent posts about children of incarcerated parents and the US detaining undocumented immigrant families.
From the post about children of incarcerated parents:
At age nine, Dave was left alone with his baby brother after their mother was arrested. Dave–who was 19 at the time of this intereview–went on to foster care and then college. He never learned why his mother had been arrested, and saw her only once after the day of her arrest.
I was nine when my mom got arrested. The police came and took her. I was trying to ask them what was going on and they wouldn’t say, and then everything went so fast. I guess they thought someone else was in the house. I don’t know. But nobody else was in the house. They arrested her and just left us there.
For two or three weeks I took care of my one-year-old brother and myself. I knew how to change his diapers and feed him and stuff. I tried to make breakfast in the morning and I burnt my hand trying to make toast. I had a blister.
I wasn’t really afraid. I was just trying to take care of my brother. That was my goal–to take care of him. Sometimes he would cry because he probably would want to see my mom.
When my mom was there, every day we used to take my little brother for a walk in the stroller. I still did that every day, even though my mom wasn’t there. Her friend across the street saw us and I guess she figured out something was wrong. She called Child Protective Services and they came and took us.
My mom did come back eventually, but by that time we were already gone. All I know is that they just rushed me in the system and that was that. They didn’t tell me why I can’t go back with my mom.
I was sent to a temporary foster home and my brother was in a different foster home. Then I got placed in the foster home where I live now. I’ve been there for about eight years.
I felt bad about being seperated from my brother. I should have had visits with my brother, to at least know exactly where he was. I just prayed that he was doing OK. During that time we were split up, my mom died. So then I was really mad because my brother was the only person I had left of my family and I didn’t know where he was.
I think when the police first arrested my mom, they should have looked around the house and seen that we were there by ourselves. Then I wouldn’t have had to take care of my brother for that long.
The police should sit down and talk with you. Explain the situation. Why, and what are they going to do with you? How long do they think your mother is going to be there? And don’t just say, “She’ll be out in a couple of days, we’re going to put you in foster care and she’ll get you back,†and then you don’t never get back out. They should just be honest with you and tell you what’s going on.
speaking with high school students about prisons/pages to prisoners
Earlier today, Joanne and I went to Bloomington South High School to talk to 4 classes of High School Students about prisons, prisoners, and the work we do with the Midwest Pages to Prisoners Project. The experience was challenging, and interesting, and generally positive, even when missing the alarm and waking up only 15 minutes before I was supposed to meet Joanne at the school.
We had been invited to speak by an IU student who was student teaching in a 10th grade English class. We were asked to speak as part of a unit where the students were reading the book A Lesson Before Dying where one of the protagonists is imprisoned and sentenced to be executed.
Others from Pages to Prisoners had spoken to school groups in years past, and Abbey said she had been somewhat disappointed by the outcome. So, Joanne and I came up with an activity to try to make our talk more engaging and to make the talk more of a dialogue between us and the students and to encourage their own critical thinking rather than just listening to and ingesting our oppinions about the criminal justice system. The activity was simple. With the classes we brainstormed ideas, pereceptions, and stereotypes that came to mind when we thought about prisons and prisoners. We also brainstormed ideas about why people in prison might write to us for books. We talked a little about the places where we got these perceptions about prisons. We wrote these words and ideas on the blackboard as we brainstormed them. Then, we passed out book request letters that had been filled and gave the students a few minutes to read the letters. We pre-selected these letters and made notes about their content. We didn’t want to pick letters that created an idealized perception of prisoners, we tried to pick a set of letters that gave an accurate representation of the letters that we tend to receive as a whole. We picked ones that showed a variety of the types of books people request, their motivations, and some of the things they mention about the conditions of incarceration and the psychological implications of being in prison.
Then, we asked the students to describe things that they had found interesting about reading the letters. We made an effort to tie the discussion of the letters back to the ideas we had brainstormed. I tried to ask open-ended questions (thanks mediation training!) to get the students to talk about their letters. “What did the letters you read say about educational programs?” “What kind of restrictions do the letters talk about?”
We closed the presentation by showing some prisoner art left over from the Prison Art Show from this past summer’s Plan-It-X fest.
I’m not really sure what I was expecting the experience to be like, but it definitely felt different. I was hoping that there would be this amazing transformative discussion with the students about prisons that challenged all our perceptions and expanded to social justice topics beyond just prisons. That didn’t materialize, but the teachers said that the students were more attentive than usual, and most seemed to participate in some degree. It’s been so long since I was a 10th grader that I’m not really sure what critical thinking skills are present. More than anything, it just seemed like the students had been conditioned to zone out when someone got up to speak in front of them and to only respond to really directed questions. I found this to be pretty difficult.
One thing that I found really uncomfortable was realizing that some of the students had family who had been incarcerated, or had been to jail themselves. It felt really fake to be standing up in front of a room talking second-hand about things that were really familiar to them. Using the letters helped make the words less my own and more those who were incarcerated, but I still felt a little akward. In the last period, there was a girl who was really outspoken about having a brother who was incarcerated and seemed really spot-on with her analysis and criticism of the prison system. It was awesome and I hope that she continues to feel comfortable talking about her ideas an experience.
Joanne has a great ability teaching and engaging people. She also has a much better handle on prison statistics than I do, and she was a lot more confident and kept things together through the first couple of classes, but I felt like it got easier as the day went on. It definitely helps to have 2 people doing the activity, with one person leading the brainstorming and the other writing on the board, or with one person talking and another keeping a stack of questions, or remembering the general outline as conversations tended to be winding, or filling in additional analysis or points that were missed.
Joanne said that in the future, it would have helped to have an outline to organize the discussion of the letters more, and this seems like a good idea, though it is nice to let the students direct the course and topics of the conversations by their interests.
Update:
In talking to the students yesterday, I tried to draw a parallel between the difficulties getting access to educational and other programming that someone might experience in prison due to frequent transfers between facilities with the experience of switching schools. In my mediation training, a woman said that over 90% of the students in the public school are in transit (this seems high, but I haven’t had a chance to fact check). The Monroe Community School Corporation has a program to try to keep elementary school kids at the same school in a given year, even if their family moves to a different part of Bloomington. But there are a lot more parallels between the education system and the prison system today.
Discipline, and particularly, the way it can be applied arbitrarily, and without any room for dialogue or explaination, is one similarity and a big one that I think resonates with many students. My friends, who are in elementary school, go to a school where one of the control mechanisms in the classroom is a card system. When an authority figure perceives a child as misbehaving, the child is made to change their card from green, to yellow, and eventually to red. I’m not sure what the consequences are for each level, but the troubling part is that the system doesn’t allow for any discussion or the child’s perspective in why discipline was applied. Also, it’s a school-wide mandate, so teachers don’t have much flexibility in deviating from this system.
While doing my mediation training, a woman from the juvenile probation district came and talked about the issue of truancy, and how she thought it was symptomatic of other conditions that students face in their lives, rather than the problem itself. More than punishing students for truancy, they aim to find solutions that made going to school more workable given the difficulties in the students’ lives. It’s a good example of a point where corrections and schools converge.
Finally, I’m reminded of the video on the school to prison pipeline that was part of this past summer’s media that matters film fest.
I think doing this presentation in the future, I would like to focus more on these parallels because I think it would engage the students more and empower them to think more critically. It might make them look at things they find undesireable about schools as systemic faults that they could choose to try to change or not abide by, rather than an unpleasant inevitability.
Bloomington Linux Users Group @ Monroe County Public Library Room 1B. 7p.
Join BLUG for a magical evening of Linux goodness. Tuesday’s
presentation will be by Scott Blaydes on Virtualization on the Linux
Desktop. We will take a look at some of the options to help users
replace Microsoft Windows on their desktop.
After the short presentation we will have an open discussion for
everyone to talk about what is going on in the Linux world and to get
advice on problems.
*NOTE: I will not be discussing Xen. Xen deserves a whole presentation       for itself…and I haven’t had the time to get it working on my laptop.