Family Prison Cells

I posted this at the Midwest Pages to Prisoners Blog.

This is an interesting follow up to my post earlier this week about mothers in prison.  This image is from a Spanish prison that has cell units for families, allegedly the only such facilities in the world.

On a related note, the Women of Color Blog has some recent posts about children of incarcerated parents and the US detaining undocumented immigrant families.

From the post about children of incarcerated parents:

At age nine, Dave was left alone with his baby brother after their mother was arrested. Dave–who was 19 at the time of this intereview–went on to foster care and then college. He never learned why his mother had been arrested, and saw her only once after the day of her arrest.

I was nine when my mom got arrested. The police came and took her. I was trying to ask them what was going on and they wouldn’t say, and then everything went so fast. I guess they thought someone else was in the house. I don’t know. But nobody else was in the house. They arrested her and just left us there.

For two or three weeks I took care of my one-year-old brother and myself. I knew how to change his diapers and feed him and stuff. I tried to make breakfast in the morning and I burnt my hand trying to make toast. I had a blister.

I wasn’t really afraid. I was just trying to take care of my brother. That was my goal–to take care of him. Sometimes he would cry because he probably would want to see my mom.

When my mom was there, every day we used to take my little brother for a walk in the stroller. I still did that every day, even though my mom wasn’t there. Her friend across the street saw us and I guess she figured out something was wrong. She called Child Protective Services and they came and took us.

My mom did come back eventually, but by that time we were already gone. All I know is that they just rushed me in the system and that was that. They didn’t tell me why I can’t go back with my mom.

I was sent to a temporary foster home and my brother was in a different foster home. Then I got placed in the foster home where I live now. I’ve been there for about eight years.

I felt bad about being seperated from my brother. I should have had visits with my brother, to at least know exactly where he was. I just prayed that he was doing OK. During that time we were split up, my mom died. So then I was really mad because my brother was the only person I had left of my family and I didn’t know where he was.

I think when the police first arrested my mom, they should have looked around the house and seen that we were there by ourselves. Then I wouldn’t have had to take care of my brother for that long.

The police should sit down and talk with you. Explain the situation. Why, and what are they going to do with you? How long do they think your mother is going to be there? And don’t just say, “She’ll be out in a couple of days, we’re going to put you in foster care and she’ll get you back,” and then you don’t never get back out. They should just be honest with you and tell you what’s going on.

Link

speaking with high school students about prisons/pages to prisoners

Earlier today, Joanne and I went to Bloomington South High School to talk to 4 classes of High School Students about prisons, prisoners, and the work we do with the Midwest Pages to Prisoners Project. The experience was challenging, and interesting, and generally positive, even when missing the alarm and waking up only 15 minutes before I was supposed to meet Joanne at the school.

We had been invited to speak by an IU student who was student teaching in a 10th grade English class. We were asked to speak as part of a unit where the students were reading the book A Lesson Before Dying where one of the protagonists is imprisoned and sentenced to be executed.

Others from Pages to Prisoners had spoken to school groups in years past, and Abbey said she had been somewhat disappointed by the outcome. So, Joanne and I came up with an activity to try to make our talk more engaging and to make the talk more of a dialogue between us and the students and to encourage their own critical thinking rather than just listening to and ingesting our oppinions about the criminal justice system. The activity was simple. With the classes we brainstormed ideas, pereceptions, and stereotypes that came to mind when we thought about prisons and prisoners. We also brainstormed ideas about why people in prison might write to us for books. We talked a little about the places where we got these perceptions about prisons. We wrote these words and ideas on the blackboard as we brainstormed them. Then, we passed out book request letters that had been filled and gave the students a few minutes to read the letters. We pre-selected these letters and made notes about their content. We didn’t want to pick letters that created an idealized perception of prisoners, we tried to pick a set of letters that gave an accurate representation of the letters that we tend to receive as a whole. We picked ones that showed a variety of the types of books people request, their motivations, and some of the things they mention about the conditions of incarceration and the psychological implications of being in prison.

Then, we asked the students to describe things that they had found interesting about reading the letters. We made an effort to tie the discussion of the letters back to the ideas we had brainstormed. I tried to ask open-ended questions (thanks mediation training!) to get the students to talk about their letters. “What did the letters you read say about educational programs?” “What kind of restrictions do the letters talk about?”

We closed the presentation by showing some prisoner art left over from the Prison Art Show from this past summer’s Plan-It-X fest.

I’m not really sure what I was expecting the experience to be like, but it definitely felt different. I was hoping that there would be this amazing transformative discussion with the students about prisons that challenged all our perceptions and expanded to social justice topics beyond just prisons. That didn’t materialize, but the teachers said that the students were more attentive than usual, and most seemed to participate in some degree. It’s been so long since I was a 10th grader that I’m not really sure what critical thinking skills are present. More than anything, it just seemed like the students had been conditioned to zone out when someone got up to speak in front of them and to only respond to really directed questions. I found this to be pretty difficult.

One thing that I found really uncomfortable was realizing that some of the students had family who had been incarcerated, or had been to jail themselves. It felt really fake to be standing up in front of a room talking second-hand about things that were really familiar to them. Using the letters helped make the words less my own and more those who were incarcerated, but I still felt a little akward. In the last period, there was a girl who was really outspoken about having a brother who was incarcerated and seemed really spot-on with her analysis and criticism of the prison system. It was awesome and I hope that she continues to feel comfortable talking about her ideas an experience.

Joanne has a great ability teaching and engaging people. She also has a much better handle on prison statistics than I do, and she was a lot more confident and kept things together through the first couple of classes, but I felt like it got easier as the day went on. It definitely helps to have 2 people doing the activity, with one person leading the brainstorming and the other writing on the board, or with one person talking and another keeping a stack of questions, or remembering the general outline as conversations tended to be winding, or filling in additional analysis or points that were missed.

Joanne said that in the future, it would have helped to have an outline to organize the discussion of the letters more, and this seems like a good idea, though it is nice to let the students direct the course and topics of the conversations by their interests.

Update:
In talking to the students yesterday, I tried to draw a parallel between the difficulties getting access to educational and other programming  that someone might experience in prison due to frequent transfers between facilities with the experience of switching schools. In my mediation training, a woman said that over 90% of the students in the public school are in transit (this seems high, but I haven’t had a chance to fact check).  The Monroe Community School Corporation has a program to try to keep elementary school kids at the same school in a given year, even if their family moves to a different part of Bloomington.  But there are a lot more parallels between the education system and the prison system today.

Discipline, and particularly, the way it can be applied arbitrarily, and without any room for dialogue or explaination, is one similarity and a big one that I think resonates with many students.  My friends, who are in elementary school, go to a school where one of the control mechanisms in the classroom is a card system.  When an authority figure perceives a child as misbehaving, the child is made to change their card from green, to yellow, and eventually to red.  I’m not sure what the consequences are for each level, but the troubling part is that the system doesn’t allow for any discussion or the child’s perspective in why discipline was applied.  Also, it’s a school-wide mandate, so teachers don’t have much flexibility in deviating from this system.

While doing my mediation training, a woman from the juvenile probation district came and talked about the issue of truancy, and how she thought it was symptomatic of other conditions that students face in their lives, rather than the problem itself.  More than punishing students for truancy, they aim to find solutions that made going to school more workable given the difficulties in the students’ lives.  It’s a good example of a point where corrections and schools converge.

Finally, I’m reminded of the video on the school to prison pipeline that was part of this past summer’s media that matters film fest.
I think doing this presentation in the future, I would like to focus more on these parallels because I think it would engage the students more and empower them to think more critically.  It might make them look at things they find undesireable about schools as systemic faults that they could choose to try to change or not abide by, rather than an unpleasant inevitability.

Bloomington Linux Users Group @ Monroe County Public Library Room 1B. 7p.

Join BLUG for a magical evening of Linux goodness.  Tuesday’s
presentation will be by Scott Blaydes on Virtualization on the Linux
Desktop.  We will take a look at some of the options to help users
replace Microsoft Windows on their desktop.

After the short presentation we will have an open discussion for
everyone to talk about what is going on in the Linux world and to get
advice on problems.
*NOTE: I will not be discussing Xen.  Xen deserves a whole presentation        for itself…and I haven’t had the time to get it working on my laptop.

my first firefox extension! a NATO phonetics converter

My paid job is doing tech-support work and I often have to convey information to users over the phone.  To make sure we’re on the same page with spellings, I use the NATO phonetic alphabet.  But, I can never remember certain letters.  One solution would be to just remember the NATO alphabet.  Or, I could just write a Firefox extension that lets you select text, click on “Show NATO Phonetics” in the context menu, and get a popup of the phonetics for the selected text.

Install the plugin

dance party @ the house of oh dang (6th and adams). 11p.

Approximately a lot of sweet party jams. Free dance lessons from everybody in the room. Dress code: look completely rad. Fashionably late? B.Y.O. drink specials. Exclusive VIP Make-Out Room in your imagination.

Published
Categorized as Lets Go

climate change is so cool?

diesel climate change fashion ads

Their new “global warming ready” campaign seems too surreal to be true, and it’s pretty disgusting. Diesel is promoting the work of an organization called Stop Global Warming. Their ad campaign website offers such “useful” tips for things that you can do like “Eat Steak at a Restaurant” (it reduces both refridgerator energy consumption and bovine methane emissions) or “Have Sex” (energetic sex creates warmth thereby reducing heating bills).

When I see things like this, I try really hard to not just think “it’s fucked”, because of course it is. I want to try to think “what does this say about us as a culture” and where in that frustrating, ugly picture can we find the beginning of something different.

Link to comentary about the ads on Daily Kos
Link to Diesel’s website (click on “Collection->Advertising Campaign” to view)

public comment on downtown parking

This is my comment for the city’s request for public comment about parking:

I was unable to attend the public meeting asking for comments but would like to submit my thoughts on the future of parking in Bloomington.Parking is an important issue in our community because, as we can see in the present, it has huge implications for how the downtown is used, how the downtown will grow, and whether Bloomington moves in a direction towards a more sustainable, ecologically conscious community, or in a more consumptive, less beautiful and liveable direction.

Since moving to Bloomington 3 years ago, I have already seen a number of parking garages and other parking facilities created. I am disappointed at the trend towards building these structures as it not only changes the visual character of the downtown, but it also encourages irresponsible automobile use in a city which has its small size and the easy pedestrian access that such smallness affords as one of its greatest assets. What is the point of making the downtown more accessible if the result is the more beautiful and historic buildings being overshadowed by new construction, or the enjoyment of walking around downtown Bloomington, dining at outdoor restaurants, or enjoying the many downtown public spaces is tarnished by increased automobile traffic. I think that new parking construction should be seen as a failure in the imagination of our community to seek solutions to an accessible downtown, especially when many alternative visions exist.

First, I think it is important to understand whether parking scarcity is a physical reality, or a perception. If it is largely an issue of public perception, then even if more spaces are created, the public may not actually feel an improvement in their downtown parking experience.

So, regardless of the final parking solutions developed by the city, education of people using our downtown must be a primary component.  I recently attended a workshop in downtown Bloomington at the city center building on 7th St. Parking was a concern for many of the attendents as nearly all of them drove, and most of them were somewhat unfamiliar with parking in the downtown area. All were able to find parking eventually, but the stressfulness and confusion of finding parking was mostly due to lack of knowledge as to the location of parking (garages, metered street parking, parking lots) being unclear and the regulations regarding parking (for instance, time limits, street sweeping days). Many of the perceptions about parking in downtown could be addressed through really simply measures like making less ambiguous signage designating no-parking zones and regulations on street parking.

Also, parking maps locating and describing downtown parking options, their restrictions, and pricing, could be erected in downtown Bloomington, especially at high-usage areas such as the Monroe County Public Library. Such signs would help users of the downtown more easily find parking options. This knowledge would easily be spread through word of mouth, making a fast and dramatic change in how people perceive the difficulty in finding parking downtown.

Growth in the city of Bloomington is happening, inevitable, and, as some would argue, desireable. This growth, however, demands solutions that are scaleable and sustainable with future growth. Considering car-centered solutions to downtown use puts the city in a dangerous cycle. As it becomes possible to have more cars in the downtown, it becomes more difficult, less pleasent, and less desireable for people to use non-automobile transportation in the downtown. More car traffic undeniably effects the experience that cyclists, walkers, and public-transportation riders have in their travel. If these transportation options become less desireable, or possible, these transportation users will have to resort to driving, thereby increasing any parking crunch that is felt by the city. The city must seriously pursue efforts which will reduce the number of cars in the downtown.

Bicycle parking is not a huge issue, but the accessibility of downtown streets to bicycles remains a challenge, and a deterrent for many who would otherwise consider it as an alternative to driving downtown.  More bicycle lanes and other efforts to make cyclists more visible, safe, and comfortable riding downtown would be one way to reduce the load on existing parking infrastructure. BT ridership is at an all-time high, but still restricted to certain segments of the population. Keeping parking space limited, but expanding bus services would be a good way of directing transportation users towards more sustainable transportation options. Forcing and enabling Bloomingtonians to challenge their perceptions and prejudices about public transporation is important for building a community-wide, diverse transportation infrastructure. Finally, the city could encourage car-sharing businesses to start operation in Bloomington. This would allow an increasing number of downtown residents to have access to cars, but in proportion to their actual usage needs. Alleviating parking issues has been one of the documented effects of car-sharing availability with one study showing that each shared car eliminated 14.9 privately owned cars! As downtown residence becomes more prevalent in Bloomington, this becomes a neccessary factor to address.

With so many options for improving access to downtown Bloomington available beyond new parking construction, it would be irresponsible for the city to choose to implement only construction-based solutions.

These solutions would be less costly, have environmental benefits or lessened environmental impact, and preserve the character of our downtown. Pursuing such options should be our transportation priority.